Seth Wenig / AP
Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan waves while processing through St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York, Jan. 22, 2012.
The Vatican?s timing was ironic. While Roman Catholic bishops in the U.S. were trying to revive their moral and political clout last week by battling President Obama over contraception coverage and religious liberty, a papally endorsed symposium was underway in Rome on how the Church has to change if it wants to prevent sexual abuse crises, the very tragedy that has shriveled the stature of Catholic prelates worldwide over the past decade, especially in the U.S. One monsignor at the Vatican gathering even suggested the hierarchy had been guilty of ?omert?,? the Mafia code of silence, by protecting abusive priests.
The Roman forum was a reminder?and the birth control clash is turning out to be one as well ? of just how much influence the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has lost in the 10 years since the abuse crisis erupted in America. It hopes that its protest of a new federal rule requiring religiously affiliated institutions like Catholic hospitals and universities to provide no-cost contraception in their health insurance coverage, even if church doctrine forbids birth control, will help restore the bishops? relevance. They did win a partial victory last Friday when Obama, acknowledging the uproar, said those institutions would no longer have to pay for the contraception coverage themselves. But the President did not fully genuflect: The compromise will still oblige religious-based employers to offer the coverage, while their insurance providers foot the bill.
(MORE: Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception)
Although major Catholic groups like Catholic Charities and the Catholic Health Association accepted that revision, the bishops are holding out for more. But their crusade to be exempted from the mandate is likely to fall short of its grail. If so, it?s because Obama read the Catholic flock better than its shepherds did.
Granted, the bishops, led by New York Archbishop and Cardinal-elect Timothy Dolan, did get the White House to acknowledge how high-handedly and ham-handedly it had managed the contraception debate?confirming along the way the public?s wariness of the so-called liberal elite?and convinced it to craft a deal that should have been policy in the first place. Yet in his refusal to cave completely to the religious liberty campaign, Obama has illustrated the reality that the bishops no longer speak for most U.S. Catholics?the nation?s largest religious denomination and a critical swing-voter group?on a host of moral issues, according to polls.
Not on abortion or the death penalty (a majority of Catholics believe those should remain legal); on divorce or homosexuality (most say those are acceptable); on women being ordained as priests and priests getting married (ditto); or on masturbation and pre-marital sex (ditto again, Your Excellencies).
(MORE: Conflict Over Obama?s Contraception Rule Intensifies)
And especially not on contraception. Ever since Pope Paul VI reaffirmed the Church?s senseless ban on birth control in 1968, few doctrines have been as vilified, ridiculed and outright ignored by Catholics ? evidenced by a recent study showing that 98% of American Catholic women have used some form of contraception. It?s hard to believe, as the bishops would have it, that those women simply succumbed to society?s pressure to do the secular thing. They?ve decided, in keeping with their faith?s precept of exercising personal conscience, that family planning is the moral and societally responsible thing to do?for example, preventing unwanted pregnancies and therefore abortions. And it explains why a recent Public Religion Research Institute poll found most Catholics support the contraception coverage mandate even for Catholic-affiliated organizations. Presumably most endorse Friday?s compromise.
Far more Evangelical Protestants, according to the PRRI survey, back the bishops than Catholics do. But that hardly makes the bishops, when it comes to the more independent Catholic vote, the same force to be reckoned with that they were in the 20th century. That is, before 2002 and the horror stories of how prelates like Cardinal Bernard Law, then Boston?s archbishop, had serially shielded alleged pedophile priests. It?s true that some bishops, like Washington Archbishop Donald Wuerl, confronted rather than coddled accused priests. But when it became clear that so many of the men in miters cared more about safeguarding the clerical corporation than about protecting kids, episcopal ?authority? vanished like so much incense smoke?and Catholics increasingly abandoned the 2,000-year-old notion that their church and their religion are the same thing.
(MORE: Obama vs. the Church)
That?s essentially what Catholics like me are asking for, especially from my colleagues in the media, during episodes like the contraception and religious liberty fracas: Stop equating what the bishops say with what we think, because we?re not the obedient, monolithic bloc that newspapers and cable news networks so tiresomely insist is in ?jeopardy? for this or that party whenever they smell church-state friction. When a hardline U.S. bishop calls for withholding communion from a Catholic politician who supports legalized abortion, stop assuming all Catholics have the prelate?s back rather than the pol?s. When Catholic politicians draft legislation like the religious liberty bills popping up on Capitol Hill right now, stop accepting their assertion that the birth-control ban is ?a major tenet? of Catholic faith, as Florida Senator Marco Rubio called it this month. For the vast majority of Catholics, it isn?t.
And for that matter, stop forgetting that in the 2008 election, 54% of Catholic voters ignored their bishops and backed a pro-choice presidential candidate like Obama. I certainly don?t point that out as some kind of endorsement of Obama in 2012. I?m simply noting that pundits and politicians need smarter criteria for gauging the Catholic vote?just as advisers in Obama?s White House shouldn?t have been so clueless about religious issues when they first decreed the contraception mandate. If the tragedy of the 2002 abuse crisis reminds us of anything, it?s that religion does matter in politics. Just ask the church leaders who are still paying a political price for their religious code of silence.
MORE: Obama Administration?s Contraception Ruling Fits with Re-Election Needs
MORE: Is the Obama Administration ?At War? with Catholics?
how to carve a turkey how to cook a turkey yorkshire pudding larry the cable guy miracle on 34th street santa tracker patrice oneal
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.